Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Perspectives on MaimonidesPhilosophical and Historical Studies$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Joel L. Kraemer

Print publication date: 1991

Print ISBN-13: 9780197100714

Published to Liverpool Scholarship Online: February 2021

DOI: 10.3828/liverpool/9780197100714.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM LIVERPOOL SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.liverpool.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Liverpool University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in LSO for personal use.date: 24 September 2021

Neoplatonic Currents in Maimonides’ Thought

Neoplatonic Currents in Maimonides’ Thought

Chapter:
(p.115) 6 Neoplatonic Currents in Maimonides’ Thought
Source:
Perspectives on Maimonides
Author(s):

Alfred L. Ivry

Publisher:
Liverpool University Press
DOI:10.3828/liverpool/9780197100714.003.0007

This chapter investigates Maimonides’ relationship to Neoplatonic thought, which can be discerned through a comparison of his writings with those of his contemporaries in both the Islamic and Jewish worlds. This would include philosophers as well as theologians and mystics, both those who lived when and where Maimonides did, as well as those who preceded him, in Egypt and elsewhere, whose writings were current and influential in twelfth-century Egypt. Some of this work has been charted by Shlomo Pines. Pines points to the probable presence of some Ismāʻīlī influence on Maimonides’ thought, though less than that found in Judah Halevi. Maimonides’ formulation of the doctrine of negative attributes in the Guide of the Perplexed, in which the method of negation is viewed as a kind of affirmation, is located in the work of the Ismāʻīlī theologian Hamīd al-Dīn al-Kirmānī; while Alfarabi, suspected of harbouring ‘Ismāʻīlī proclivities’, is apparently viewed as a possible conduit for Shīʻī influence upon Maimonides’ political philosophy. The limited number of these examples does not betoken a major influence of Ismāʻīlī doctrine upon Maimonides’ thought, but does point the way to future research in this direction.

Keywords:   Maimonides, Neoplatonic thought, Egypt, Shlomo Pines, Ismāʻīlī, Guide of the Perplexed, Alfarabi, Shīʻīsm, political philosophy

Liverpool Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.