Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Rwanda Since 1994Stories of Change$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Hannah Grayson and Nicki Hitchcott

Print publication date: 2019

Print ISBN-13: 9781786941992

Published to Liverpool Scholarship Online: January 2020

DOI: 10.3828/liverpool/9781786941992.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM LIVERPOOL SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.liverpool.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Liverpool University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in LSO for personal use.date: 01 June 2020

Human Rights Reporting on Rwanda’s Gacaca Courts: A Story of Stagnation and Failure

Human Rights Reporting on Rwanda’s Gacaca Courts: A Story of Stagnation and Failure

Chapter:
(p.41) Human Rights Reporting on Rwanda’s Gacaca Courts: A Story of Stagnation and Failure
Source:
Rwanda Since 1994
Author(s):

Benjamin Thorne

Julia Viebach

Publisher:
Liverpool University Press
DOI:10.3828/liverpool/9781786941992.003.0004

Building on legal anthropology and performance studies, this chapter analyses the Gacaca law talk and performances to evidence the wider context of changes in Rwanda post-1994 due to national and international pressures. The Rwandan government legally mandated Rwandans to actively participate in the gacaca courts from 2004 to 2012 for crimes committed during the 1994 Genocide against Tutsi. Every citizen was required to attend the local level courts to provide testimony and to serve as judge, witness and testifier on a weekly basis. In total, 15,300 courts ruled over nearly two million cases. Based on a 'kaleidoscopic' reading of optical illusions, or a slight shift in perspective to integrate the multiplicity of performances within the gacaca system, we demonstrate the dramaturgic nature of gacaca through gacaca law, policy and practices. Ultimately, such visual metaphors provide important interpretative tools to grasp how gacaca scripts were performed for different audiences with different effects and functions depending on micro to macro politics, and the resulting performances of competing narratives and the variances within the gacaca system.

Keywords:   Legal Anthropology, Performance Studies, Gacaca, Courts, Rwanda, Narrative

Liverpool Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.