This epilogue looks at the continuing elusiveness of a definition for ‘idiocy’. It argues that the idea of idiocy is changeable — its borders move and its meanings shift according to where and when one is standing while observing the phenomenon. These changes are often most evident in the cultural representations of idiocy, which do not presume objectivity or spin a narrative of medical progress, but instead use the idea of idiocy as a tool to perform certain acts, to convey certain kinds of information.
Liverpool Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.